VIVARAE NEWS

Warner Music sues Ray-Ban's owner for US$64 million over songs used in its social media posts

Warner Music accuses companies in the EssilorLuxottica group of using at least 427 songs without permission in Instagram and TikTok posts. Why the music on social networks is not free for brands and how to avoid the problem.

· By , journalist

Warner Music sues Ray-Ban's owner for US$64 million over songs used in its social media posts

Photo: Jacek Halicki, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons

Warner Music has sued several companies in the EssilorLuxottica group, owner of Ray-Ban and Oakley, for using at least 427 songs without a licence in Instagram and TikTok posts. At the legal maximum of US$150,000 per work, the claim exceeds US$64 million. The case carries a lesson for any brand: the music that social networks offer is for personal use, not commercial use.

What the lawsuit says

ItemDetail
PlaintiffsAtlantic Music Group, Warner Chappell and other Warner Music Group companies
DefendantsLuxottica Group, Oakley, Eye Buy Direct and Costa Del Mar
CourtFederal court in New York
Works claimedAt least 427, including recordings and compositions
RecordingsAbout 140, by artists such as Dua Lipa, the Ramones, Charli XCX, the Black Keys and Van Halen
Maximum amountMore than US$64 million (US$150,000 per work)
Prior warningsTwo cease-and-desist letters, in December 2025 and May 2026

The details were published by Digital Music News, which reviewed the text of the complaint. According to Warner, the group's brands have more than 36 million followers and their social media strategy has been key to their commercial results. EssilorLuxottica did not respond to that outlet's request for comment before publication. This is a pending lawsuit: what is described are one side's allegations, and there is no ruling.

The key point: social media music is not for brands

When a person uploads a video with a song from TikTok's or Instagram's library, they are covered: the platforms pay licences for that personal use. A company promoting its products is not. Commercial use requires its own licence, and that includes paid influencer posts.

The lawsuit argues that the companies ignored the platforms' own warnings, and includes a screenshot of TikTok's music usage confirmation page. It also claims over the videos of hired influencers, under the heading of indirect infringement.

It is not an isolated case

The major labels have been filing suits of this kind for years. Digital Music News lists cases against the drink Bang Energy, the shoe chain DSW, the cookie brand Crumbl, the clothing retailer Pacsun, restaurants, universities and NBA and hockey teams. Several ended in settlements.

UseCovered by the platform's licence?
A person posts a video with a trending songYes
A brand posts a product video with that same songNo
An influencer paid by the brand uses the song in the adNo
A brand uses the platform's commercial music libraryYes

How to avoid the problem if you run a brand's account

  • Use the commercial library. TikTok has a commercial music library and Meta a collection of royalty-free sounds, designed for business accounts.
  • If you want the trending song, license it. You need permission for both the recording and the composition, which usually have different owners.
  • Check what your influencers post. If the video is part of a paid campaign, liability can reach the brand.
  • Deleting it later does not erase the infringement. Lawsuits include old videos.
  • Do not ignore a warning letter. In this case there were two before the lawsuit.

This describes the case and general practice in the United States; it is not legal advice, and the rules vary by country.

Why the labels keep pushing

Because short video is now where songs become hits and where brands advertise. The labels want to be paid for that use just as they are for a song in a television commercial. And US law gives them a powerful tool: up to US$150,000 per work when the infringement is wilful, which turns a few hundred videos into a figure in the tens of millions.

On how brands sell on social media, see Rihanna's live on TikTok Shop. And on the audio business, what a podcast is.

Frequently asked questions

Why did Warner Music sue Ray-Ban's owner?

Because it accuses companies in the EssilorLuxottica group of using at least 427 songs without a licence in Instagram and TikTok posts.

How much money is it asking for?

At the legal maximum of US$150,000 per work, more than US$64 million.

Can a company use TikTok songs in its videos?

Only those in the commercial music library. The rest are licensed for personal use.

Is there a ruling yet?

No. The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in New York and is pending.